100 W
Rated
Frequencynon-resonant by design: the 9:1 unun drags the wire's 500-1500 ohm chaos into internal-tuner range
Bandsmultiband with the rig's tuner: the stock 29 ft covers 40-10 territory; longer cuts (35.5/41/58/71 ft) reach further down
TX power100 W (100 W SSB/CW, 50 W digital - the maker splits the rating by duty cycle)
ModesSSB, CW, AM, FM, digital
Connector9:1 unun integrated with the winder; BNC to the radio; two banana sockets for optional radials/counterpoise (manual)
Connectors
feedpoint9:1 unun; BNC; banana sockets for counterpoise

Estimated (unverified): weight (unpublished); the power split appears on the store listing rather than in the manual text

The other portable philosophy: a deliberately NON-resonant wire (stock 29 ft of 26AWG copper-clad steel) whose 9:1 unun tames 500-1500 ohms into anything an internal tuner handles - every band, one wire, tuner required Length menu by mission: 29, 35.5, 41, 58, or 71 feet - each cut chosen to dodge the half-wave impedance spikes tuners hate 100 W SSB/CW but 50 W digital: a maker splitting its rating by duty cycle instead of hoping Same winder-as-chassis, same gram discipline, same sealed-box build as the EFHW sibling The KX2/G90 generation's favorite: rigs with wide internal tuners made this architecture sing, and the POTA field-report literature documents it endlessly Counterpoise per the manual: not strictly required at low power, but 'generally recommended... to ensure a better match and keep common mode currents from flowing back to the radio' - two banana sockets await it
Strengths

Maximum band agility per gram: where the EFHW commits to a band at the workbench, the random wire defers the decision to the tuner button - every band from one pocketable wire, with cut lengths engineered to keep the impedance inside what internal tuners actually match. Paired with the wide-tuner QRP generation, it is the one-antenna travel kit.

Weaknesses

The tuner is now mandatory equipment, the 9:1's transformation plus coax loss on high-SWR lines quietly taxes every watt (the resonant sibling wastes less), digital duty halves the rating, and the counterpoise the marketing soft-pedals still determines whether the magic happens. Random is a strategy, not an absence of one.

Verdict

The travel answer: one wire, every band, tuner does the thinking. Efficiency purists carry the EFHW and choose summits' bands in advance; everyone else appreciates not having to.

The Mini Random Wire is PackTenna's other philosophy, sold in the same gram-counted hardware: where the EFHW sibling commits to a band when the wire is cut, the random wire defers every decision to the radio's tuner. The architecture is the classic one - a deliberately non-resonant length (29 feet stock, with 35.5, 41, 58, and 71-foot cuts down the menu) presenting 500 to 1500 chaotic ohms that a 9:1 unun drags into the range internal tuners actually match. 'Random' is a misnomer with engineering inside: the offered lengths are chosen precisely to dodge the half-wave resonances whose impedance spikes no internal tuner can touch.

The rating sheet splits with unusual honesty - 100 watts SSB and CW but 50 for digital, a maker acknowledging duty cycle instead of hoping - and the field pairing that made the design famous is the wide-internal-tuner QRP generation: the KX2s and G90s whose tuners treat the 9:1's output as a solved problem. The POTA field-report literature documents the combination endlessly, including half-watt CW activations that read like dares. The counterpoise footnote comes straight from the manual: nothing extra is strictly required at low power, but a counterpoise is 'generally recommended' for a better match and to keep common-mode current off the coax - and the matchbox carries two banana sockets waiting for exactly that wire.

Choosing between the siblings is choosing a philosophy of weight: the EFHW spends its grams on resonance and wastes nothing in transformation; the random wire spends them on agility and pays a quiet tax in tuner and transformer loss. PackTenna's achievement is making both choices first-class - same sealed construction, same winder-as-chassis packing, same engineering candor in the manuals - so the decision is about your operating, not the hardware.